Jump to content

QESTField 4.1.17 Release Notes: Difference between revisions

From QESTonline
Benny.thomas (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
Benny.thomas (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
Line 62: Line 62:
<BR>
<BR>
Finally, a patch has been written to update old data to ensure the Moisture Content is formatted correctly, as well as the Wet Density and Dry Density on the Field Density Test Report when ASTM D 1556 is used, even when going directly to the test report. Without the patch, it would be necessary  
Finally, a patch has been written to update old data to ensure the Moisture Content is formatted correctly, as well as the Wet Density and Dry Density on the Field Density Test Report when ASTM D 1556 is used, even when going directly to the test report. Without the patch, it would be necessary  
|}
===QESTField 4.1.17.1===
{|class="wikitable"
|- valign="top"
!Bug/CR ID
!Customer Code
!Customer Reference
!Product(s) Modified
!Name
!Release Notes
|- valign="top"
|style="background:white;"|Bug#5601
|style="background:white;"|USPSI
|style="background:white;"|PSI1486
|style="background:white;"|QESTField
|style="background:white;"|QESTField Road Work Workflow - Missing General Location
|style="background:white;"|The General Location field has now been added to the Roadwork Workflow. All corresponding workflows that require this workflow will now show 'General Location' if the sample type has been set to 'Roadwork'.
|- valign="top"
|style="background:white smoke;"|Bug#5603
|style="background:white smoke;"|USPSI
|style="background:white smoke;"|PSI1489
|style="background:white smoke;"|QESTField
|style="background:white smoke;"|Concrete Testing: Concrete Field Report will no longer be added for TxDOT Special Projects laboratories
|style="background:white smoke;"|The Concrete Testing workflows have been modified so that these workflows will no longer add a Concrete Field Report (ID 18971) to the work order when performed by a laboratory in the "TxDOT Special Projects" region.
|- valign="top"
|style="background:white;"|Bug#5604
|style="background:white;"|USPSI
|style="background:white;"|QNET656
|style="background:white;"|QESTField
|style="background:white;"|List restriction on source and product lists no longer restrict items with blank or '(all)' restricting codes.
|style="background:white;"|Restrictions by Supplier and Source on the Source and Product lists will no longer exclude list items marked with a null, blank or '(all)' value for the restricting code.  <BR>
This applies to all sample types, i.e. Concrete Plants and Mixes, Asphalt Plants and Mixes, Agg/Soil Sources and Materials, Other Sources and Materials.
|- valign="top"
|style="background:white smoke;"|Bug#5605
|style="background:white smoke;"|USPSI
|style="background:white smoke;"|PSI1484
|style="background:white smoke;"|QESTField
|style="background:white smoke;"|List restriction handling added for '(all)'
|style="background:white smoke;"|List restriction interactions in QESTField will now treat any list items with a restriction value of "(all)" as being unrestricted.
|}
|}


===QESTLab 4.1.2200 RC===
===QESTLab 4.1.2200 RC===
Complete Release Notes available here: [[QESTLab 4.1.2200 RC, QESTField 4.1.17 (QESTNET.Upgrade 1.37) Release Notes]]
Complete Release Notes available here: [[QESTLab 4.1.2200 RC, QESTField 4.1.17 (QESTNET.Upgrade 1.37) Release Notes]]

Latest revision as of 00:00, 20 April 2016

QESTField 4.1.17

Bug/CR ID Customer Code Customer Reference Product(s) Modified Name Release Notes
Bug#5256 INTERNAL N/A QESTLab, QESTField Agg/Soil Sample: Elevation units inconsistent between QESTField and QESTLab A bug exists in QESTField's Aggregate/Soil Sample workflows where the "Elevation" field's units are determined by the "Enable Imperial Units Formatting" option for the Default region instead of the "Sample GPS Elevation is in IP Units" option for the current laboratory. This will cause the value to be inconsistent between QESTField and QESTLab if these options do not match.


As part of addressing this, the QEST Admin Console patch which migrates options from the system-level to the laboratory-level has been corrected to set the value in the Default region rather than for each laboratory.

Note that until this issue is rectified in a future release, QESTField will use the options "Enable Imperial Units Formatting" and "Sample GPS Elevation is in IP Units" as set in the Default region. Please ensure these options have been set in this region.


An additional issue reported, where Elevation was undesirably copied into the "Location Description" field, can be corrected by setting the document-level option "Copy GPS Elevation to Location" to false for Aggregate/Soil Sample (ID 1001).

Bug#5312 INTERNAL N/A QESTLab, QESTField Changes to precision of entry and display for In-Situ Density - Sand Cone Method The following changes have been made relating to the In-Situ Density - Sand Cone Method [ASTM D 1556 - 2007] (and Relative Compaction) screen in QESTLab, the equivalent workflow in QESTField, and the display of values in reports such as the Field Density Test Report.
  • When entering masses to determine the Moisture Content as part of determining a field density by the sand cone method, entry will be reduced to 2 decimal places, i.e. to the nearest 0.01 g.
  • Water Content (or Moisture Content) on reports will be displayed to 2 significant figures (note this will not affect other kinds of field density testing, such as ASTM D 6938).
  • In-Place Wet Density and In-Place Dry Density are reported to 3 significant figures - in addition to data entry for the sand cone method, this will also apply to the Wet Density and Dry Density on the Relative Compaction screen and Field Density Test Report, where applicable.


Additionally, now when any Relative Compaction test (for example Relative Compaction [AS 1289.5.4.1] (ID10280) imports from one of the following tests, the field moisture content will be reported to the following precisions according to the standards:

  • Field Density Sand Replacement [Q111A - 1996] * (ID10306): nearest 0.1%
  • Field Density Sand Replacement [Q111A - 96] (ID10308): nearest 0.1%
  • Compacted Density of Soils and Crushed Rock (Sand Replacement) [Q111B - 08] (ID10329): nearest 0.1%
  • Compacted Density of Soils and Crushed Rock (Sand Replacement) [Q141B - 2010] (ID10337): nearest 0.1%
  • In-situ Density - Sand Replacement Method [BS 1377-9: 1990] (ID10335): 2 significant figures

(To avoid confusion, Queensland Dry Density Ratio tests such as Dry Density Ratio [Q143, Q140A] (ID10348) were already reporting the Field Moisture Content correctly and are unaffected by this change.)

Finally, a patch has been written to update old data to ensure the Moisture Content is formatted correctly, as well as the Wet Density and Dry Density on the Field Density Test Report when ASTM D 1556 is used, even when going directly to the test report. Without the patch, it would be necessary

QESTField 4.1.17.1

Bug/CR ID Customer Code Customer Reference Product(s) Modified Name Release Notes
Bug#5601 USPSI PSI1486 QESTField QESTField Road Work Workflow - Missing General Location The General Location field has now been added to the Roadwork Workflow. All corresponding workflows that require this workflow will now show 'General Location' if the sample type has been set to 'Roadwork'.
Bug#5603 USPSI PSI1489 QESTField Concrete Testing: Concrete Field Report will no longer be added for TxDOT Special Projects laboratories The Concrete Testing workflows have been modified so that these workflows will no longer add a Concrete Field Report (ID 18971) to the work order when performed by a laboratory in the "TxDOT Special Projects" region.
Bug#5604 USPSI QNET656 QESTField List restriction on source and product lists no longer restrict items with blank or '(all)' restricting codes. Restrictions by Supplier and Source on the Source and Product lists will no longer exclude list items marked with a null, blank or '(all)' value for the restricting code.

This applies to all sample types, i.e. Concrete Plants and Mixes, Asphalt Plants and Mixes, Agg/Soil Sources and Materials, Other Sources and Materials.

Bug#5605 USPSI PSI1484 QESTField List restriction handling added for '(all)' List restriction interactions in QESTField will now treat any list items with a restriction value of "(all)" as being unrestricted.

QESTLab 4.1.2200 RC

Complete Release Notes available here: QESTLab 4.1.2200 RC, QESTField 4.1.17 (QESTNET.Upgrade 1.37) Release Notes